f98	Surrey v Hampshire
	First-Class matches in England 1789
Venue	Moulsey Hurst on 30th, 31st July, 1st August 1789 (3-day match)
Balls per over	4
Toss	Toss not known
Result	Surrey won by 221 runs
Close of play day 1
Close of play day 2

---

Surrey first innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
Earl of Winchilsea	b Taylor	32
G Talbot	b Smith	24
Vincent	b Taylor	7
Butcher	b Taylor	28
E Stevens	b Taylor	0
H Walker	run out	47
T Sueter	b Taylor	23
J Wells	b Neale	80
Bonick	not out	2
T Ingram	b Smith	20
J Walker	c Nyren b [unknown]	13
Extras	(9 b)	9
Total	(all out)	285
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-285

Hampshire bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Taylor	?	?	?	5	-	-
Smith	?	?	?	2	-	-
Neale	?	?	?	1	-	-

---

Hampshire first innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
TA Smith	c Ingram b [unknown]	20
J Neale	c H Walker b [unknown]	12
E Hale	c H Walker b [unknown]	2
J Nyren	b Stevens	20
J Small sen	b Bonick	2
J Small jun	c Ingram b [unknown]	30
Carpenter	c J Walker b [unknown]	2
T Taylor	b Stevens	0
Horsey	not out	0
A Freemantle	run out	28
White	b Stevens	4
Extras	(6 b)	6
Total	(all out)	126
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-126

Surrey bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Stevens	?	?	?	3	-	-
Bonick	?	?	?	1	-	-

---

Surrey second innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
Earl of Winchilsea	c J Small jun b [unknown]	1
G Talbot	b Smith	6
Vincent	c Smith b [unknown]	29
H Walker	b Flint	47
T Sueter	not out	33
T Ingram	not out	54
J Walker	run out	4
Butcher	did not bat
E Stevens	did not bat
J Wells	did not bat
Bonick	did not bat
Extras	(2 b)	2
Total	(5 wickets, declared)	176
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?

Hampshire bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Smith	?	?	?	1	-	-
Flint	?	?	?	1	-	-

---

Hampshire second innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
TA Smith	c Ingram b [unknown]	0
J Neale	run out	22
E Hale	c Ingram b [unknown]	9
J Nyren	c Ingram b [unknown]	0
J Small sen	b Ingram	48
J Small jun	b Stevens	3
Carpenter	c J Walker b [unknown]	1
T Taylor	b Ingram	23
Horsey	b Ingram	0
A Freemantle	c Vincent b [unknown]	2
White	not out	4
Extras	(2 b)	2
Total	(all out)	114
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-114

Surrey bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Stevens	?	?	?	1	-	-
Ingram	?	?	?	3	-	-

---

Notes
--> Hampshire full substitute: Flint for unknown
--> Bonick made his debut in First-Class matches
--> E Hale made his debut in First-Class matches
--> Carpenter made his debut in First-Class matches
--> White made his debut in First-Class matches
--> Flint made his debut in First-Class matches
--> Flint made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> Vincent made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> Bonick made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> Carpenter made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> Horsey made his last appearance in First-Class matches
--> J Wells (1) passed his previous highest score of 37 in First-Class matches
--> TA Smith (1) passed his previous highest score of 10 in First-Class matches
--> A Freemantle (1) passed his previous highest score of 11 in First-Class matches
--> Vincent (2) passed his previous highest score of 12 in First-Class matches
--> T Ingram (2) passed his previous highest score of 40 in First-Class matches
--> J Neale (2) passed his previous highest score of 12 in First-Class matches
--> T Taylor equalled his best innings bowling analysis in First-Class matches in the Surrey first innings
--> T Taylor reached 50 wickets in First-Class matches when taking his 3rd wicket in the Surrey first innings
--> T Ingram achieved his best innings bowling analysis in First-Class matches in the Hampshire second innings
--> E Stevens reached 300 wickets in First-Class matches when taking his 1st wicket in the Hampshire second innings

---

Surrey appear to have given up their second innings: this has been treated as a declaration, although the laws of the day did not provide for such an act. Flint apparently bowled H Walker in Surrey (2) and he has therefore been shown as a full sub for Hampshire (in place of whom is not known), although he does not appear to have batted in Hampshire (2). He had appeared for Surrey in a colts match so maybe he was a local man brought into the Hampshire side in emergency. All versions of the score have Nyland playing for Hampshire. No player of this name is known, but throughout the career of R Nyren it is found in reports as a fairly common variant of his surname. Given that R Nyren was now 55, it has been assumed to be J Nyren, who appeared in the equivalent match in 1788. White of Andover - assumed not to be the same as W White. Carpenter of Alresford. Altogether this is a strange game with big names on both sides but also some notable absentees and a large number of fringe players. A number of participants (Carpenter, Flint, Freemantle, Smith, Talbot, Vincent, J Walker, Winchilsea) also appeared in the colts match between these counties in June (SB p90), in which several of them did well.
One newspaper has T Walker playing in this match, but two others give J Walker (who had played for Surrey earlier in 1789) and this is accepted.

 

 

 

 

This page was created by the CricketArchive Oracles