misc330512	Lucas v River Valley
	New York and Metropolitan District Cricket League Division Two Challenge Cup 2003 (Semi-Final)
Venue	Marine Park, Mill Creek on 21st September 2003 (35-over match)
Balls per over	6
Toss	Lucas won the toss and decided to bat
Result	Lucas won by a concession
Umpires	[unknown], C Ross

---

Lucas innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s	S-Rate
+M Gray	b Allen	17	24	46	2	-	70.83
T Henry	b Forde	24	40	28	3	-	60.00
K Thomas	b Powell	24	36	75	-	-	66.67
L Ramsay	b Powell	40	42	60	3	1	95.24
F Griffith	not out	50	32		1	2	156.25
A Mohamed	not out	54	34		4	2	158.82
W Ricketts	did not bat
E White	did not bat
N Whittaker	did not bat
E McGill	did not bat
G Edwards	did not bat
Extras	(1 b, 3 lb, 1 nb, 11 w)	16
Total	(4 wickets, innings closed, 35 overs)	227
Fall of wickets:
1-45 (Henry), 2-45 (Gray), 3-111 (Ramsay), 4-121 (Thomas)

River Valley bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls	S-Rate	Econ
Forde	7	0	17	1	-	-	42.00	2.43
Daley	7	0	53	0	1	-	-	7.57
Allen	7	1	53	1	9	-	42.00	7.57
Mattis	7	0	37	0	-	-	-	5.29
Powell	6	0	51	2	1	-	18.00	8.50
Lewis	1	0	13	0	-	-	-	13.00

---

River Valley innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s	S-Rate
D Fisher	c Griffith b Whittaker	8	13	20	2	-	61.54
K Lewis	c Ricketts b Whittaker	5	7	12	-	-	71.43
N Desai	c Gray b Thomas	17	23	53	1	-	73.91
E Mattis	lbw b Edwards	14	25	55	-	-	56.00
D Gardner	not out	3
R Forde	did not bat
E Daley	did not bat
R Allen	did not bat
J Powell	did not bat
[unknown]	did not bat
[unknown]	did not bat
Extras	(1 b, 2 lb, 4 w)	7
Total	(4 wickets, 15 overs)	54
Fall of wickets:
1-10 (Lewis), 2-15 (Fisher), 3-48 (Desai), 4-54 (Mattis, 15 ov)

Lucas bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls	S-Rate	Econ
Whittaker	5	0	21	2	-	-	15.00	4.20
Thomas	7	0	18	1	2	-	42.00	2.57
Edwards	3	0	13	1	-	-	18.00	4.33

---

Notes
--> Lucas innings batting adds 2 runs under
--> Bowling in the Lucas innings adds 1 run over
--> Bowling in the River Valley innings adds 1 run over

---

The match was called off at the fall of the fourth wicket and the game awarded to Lucas. No reason was given but possibly a dispute over the 'lbw' decision.

 

 

 

 

This page was created by the CricketArchive Oracles