llmisc692	Enfield v Rawtenstall
	North-East Lancashire League 1891
Venue	Dill Hall Lane, Enfield on 22nd August 1891 (1-day single innings match)
Balls per over	5
Toss	Toss not known
Result	Enfield won by 38 runs
Points	Enfield 2; Rawtenstall 0

---

Enfield innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
E Whittaker (Pro)	b Bedford	4
J Ingram (Pro)	b Pullan	1
H Thornton	c Pullan b Bedford	6
R Riley	c sub b Ingham	8
J Atkinson	st Ingham b Bedford	0
HL Wilson	c Hindle b Fry	17
*J Pickup	c sub b Pullan	24
W Thornton	b Hindle	1
L Rushton	c Ashworth b Pullan	11
Cowburn	not out	3
[unknown]	b [unknown]	10
Extras		9
Total	(all out)	94
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?, 8-?, 9-?, 10-94

Rawtenstall bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Bedford	?	?	?	3	-	-
Pullan	?	?	?	3	-	-
Ingham	?	?	?	1	-	-
Fry	?	?	?	1	-	-
Hindle	?	?	?	1	-	-

---

Rawtenstall innings		Runs	Balls	Mins	4s	6s
TB Pullan (Pro)	b Ingram	1
H Hindle	b Whittaker	3
T Pickup	b H Thornton	16
A Ashworth	c Ingram b H Thornton	7
Bedford (Pro)	c Atkinson b W Thornton	1
+A Ingham	b Atkinson	8
Fry	c Wilson b Ingram	5
J Riley	not out	15
TH Heyworth	absent
J Hope	absent
H Greenwood	absent
Extras		0
Total	(all out)	56
Fall of wickets:
1-?, 2-?, 3-?, 4-?, 5-?, 6-?, 7-?

Enfield bowling	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	Wides	No-Balls
Ingram	?	?	?	2	-	-
Whittaker	?	?	?	1	-	-
Atkinson	?	?	?	1	-	-
H Thornton	?	?	?	2	-	-
W Thornton	2	0	6	1	-	-

---

Notes
--> Bowling in the Rawtenstall innings adds 50 runs under

---

One home team batter was missing from the printed scorecard which presumably accounts for the missing 10 runs.
The Accrington Times reported that "curiously three men booked absent, a course of proceeding which credited Enfield with victory".
"When seven wickets proper had fallen there was no Rawtenstall batter to respond to the call, consequently the match came to an abrupt conclusion".

 

 

 

 

This page was created by the CricketArchive Oracles